Quoting Diane Trout (2022-06-17 07:12:58) > On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 00:32 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > I guess that by "MIT / Expat" you mean that you declared the project > > as > > beinge effectively licensed "MIT or Expat". > > Upstream lists this license: > https://github.com/xarray-contrib/sphinx-autosummary-accessors/blob/main/LICENSE > > Which looks like MIT (Expat) > https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/mit > > > > > From your description of the situation, the better approach is to > > instead declare it as licensed "MIT and Expat". > > In reading the history of how this project came to be they say at > https://github.com/xarray-contrib/sphinx-autosummary-accessors > > sphinx.ext.autosummary is able to create summary and object pages > for objects and their methods, but it doesn't work well with > accessor styled properties and methods (obj.accessor.attribute). > pandas has accessor documentation built using sphinx.ext.autosummary > templates, which xarray recently adopted by copying the templates > and all related code. > > To avoid even more duplicated code, and to make it easier for > projects to document their custom accessors, this project aims to > provide this functionality by way of a sphinx extension. > > Most of the code was adapted from pandas. > > Which is why I think the pandas BSD 3 clause license is included. > > So perhaps it would be best to say MIT and BSD-3-clause.
Makes good sense. Sorry for my complete nonsense: I am baffled that I managed to write a full email without noticing that I was talking about same license twice, not two separate licenses. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
