On Sun, 07 Jun 2020 17:45:41 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Correction, given the amount of time that's passed and that I'm not > even sure if the person who responded negatively on the previous > issue speaks for the current maintainers, I have opened a new issue: > > https://github.com/chansen/p5-http-tiny/issues/134
Revisiting this issue now, the state seems to be: The upstream ticket was closed with "On reflection, we shouldn't make this change for backwards compatibility." So I guess we are back to the point where we have to discuss if we want to make the change on the Debian side and carry the patch (and keep the pieces if something breaks). I think we had a tendence to say "this change makes sense" and "it doesn't look like huge breakage ahead" but I guess someone need to pick up this issue and take a deeper look. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
