On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 01:52:42PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:44:10 -0700 tony mancill <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 03:58:48PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> > > Package: cqrlog
> > > Version: 2.5.2-1
> > >
> > > The cqrlog package has no AppStream metadata file although this file is 
> > > already present in upstream[1]. Please, consider adding this file.
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/ok2cqr/cqrlog/blob/master/tools/cqrlog.appdata.xml
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see the file in the current Debian package:
> >
> > $ debc cqrlog_2.5.2-1_amd64.changes | grep appdata.xml
> > -rw-r--r-- root/root      1266 2022-01-11 08:26 
> > ./usr/share/metainfo/cqrlog.appdata.xml
> >
> > And I also see the metadata registered for bookworm (Debian testing):
> >
> > https://appstream.debian.org/bookworm/main/metainfo/cqrlog.html
> >
> > Is there some other place where it should be included?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > tony
> 
> Hi,
> 
> ah, the AppData file seems to be in the cqrlog-data package (along with 
> desktop icon files), not the main cqrlog one. I am however not sure whether 
> this is supported by GNOME Software / KDE Discover and the Debian/Ubuntu 
> AppStream generator itself[1]. GNOME Software on Ubuntu 22.04 (which uses 
> cqrlog 2.5.2-1 package synced from Debian) does not seem to display valid 
> metadata for the cqrlog package - it uses autogenerated metadata from its 
> desktop file (and no icon) instead.

Hi Daniel,

:facepalm:  I didn't look closely enough.  Thank you for pointing this
out.  Since cqrlog depends on cqrlog-data with the same source version,
I think this should be fairly simple to move into cqrlog.

I will have a go at it later this weekend.

Cheers,
tony
> 
> Daniel
> 
> [1] https://appstream.debian.org/bookworm/main/issues/cqrlog.html
> 

Reply via email to