tags 996326 + patch thanks On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 03:07:50 +0200 Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> wrote: > Supposedly, all versions since stretch/bionic should be able > to do static PIE, at least as far as my research shows me, but > I either can’t seem to figure it out, or it’s plain broken. > > Both of… > musl-gcc -fPIE -static-pie -o foo foo.c -v -fno-lto > musl-gcc -fPIE -static -static-pie -o foo foo.c -v -fno-lto > … fail, as the -v shows, it passes -dynamic-linker and doesn’t > pick rcrt0. (The -fno-lto makes the output marginally more > legible so I included it in an otherwise minimal example.) > > The first generates a dynamically linked(?) PIE executable that > lintian detects as a shared library not linked against (g)libc, > the second is… I don’t even know; file says static but it doesn’t > have the right crt objects but *has* -dynamic-linker… > > So how can we get static PIE with musl on Debian, and in which > releases?
There's a patch available at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/musl/blob/rawhide/f/musl-1.2.0-Support-static-pie-with-musl-gcc-specs.patch that should make static-pie work.
