On Sat 2022-01-15 10:43:13 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > I disagree. The version proposed by me was: > >> - *-*-linux-gnu*) >> + *-*-linux-*) > > The version that actually ended up upstream was: > > + *-*-linux-gnu* | *-*-linux-musl) > > The thing that it doesn't match is: > > arm-linux-musleabihf
Thanks for this followup, Helmut, and for your persistence.
I've re-opened the upstream bug report with this information. If
upstream agrees that this makes sense, i'm happy to update the patch for
the debian package.
i appreciate your work on getting (and keeping) alternate debian
architectures in healthy shape! This is an important backstop for
f/loss ecosystem health.
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
