Hi Mattia,
> However I noticed that you only applied that patch to the
> bullseye-backports branch. I wonder why not just push it to "sid" as
> well, and reduce the delta between bookworm and bullseye-backports to be
> as little as possible?
Definitely agree with the principle about minimising the backports
diff. But given that this patch relaxes a dependency (which presumably
wouldn't be supported by upstream), I'd prefer to limit the number of
places we do that. Happy to be convinced otherwise, but that was my
gut feel at the time.
> If that's not in your plans, I guess this bug report can be closed.
(Going to close, at least for now. Thanks for spotting and chasing
up!)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
