Control: block -1 by 999871
On 2021-11-18 20:15 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2021-11-17 20:21 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
>> Since the feature was already present in a different form,
>> it seems that neovim is the only widespread user of this.
>
> Quite likely.
>
>>> I am not quite sure what to do with this in ncurses. As long as the
>>> problem only affects neovim and VTE based terminal emulators I am
>>> inclined to ignore it, but if it turns out to be more widespread I could
>>> back out the new feature, like I did in #933053.
>>
>> I don't see that it's necessary.
>
> Yes, I think a versioned Breaks against neovim should be sufficient,
> once a fixed neovim package is available.
A fixed neovim has been requested by Josh in #999871 (a clone of this
bug), adding that one as a blocker.
Cheers,
Sven
