-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2021-10-21 at 18:03 -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> I believe we only disabled the use of /usr/lib/${installable_name} in
> favor of /usr/lib/${source_name}. (I think I was unable to find
> packages using that exemption.) Is your package affected by that
> change?
>
> The commit [2] reduced the nesting depth and the complexity of the
> conditionals. It is therefore possible that the relevant portion of
> the check did not previously run for your package.
Actually I've double-checked and I previously had an override for binary-or-
shlib-defines-rpath which has been “replaced” by the new ones.
I've adjusted the overrides for now. I think it'd be nice to have a way to
express that there's a generic/accepted RPATH for a package (which might be
different than the source name), but for now the overrides works for that.
Thanks for the reply anyway.
Regards,
- --
Yves-Alexis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAmFymqoACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFvXJAgA6ru9l5QdgJ2poWiRUGSwvPqAXE4HXVpY4HUWIl2u1NXBkpWvIFjC+KSs
C3Mj8J4v2YHpnPJWIDzGOo5+Xtdxa1fbag8Yal6BlEfAUDsINvezMcR2kgpY72Ch
lgvYma2V0psnnFassvLigGynA2HtZKufFQS3L2HMNpIbZ4PJTpRJXDYXLNA9zja0
H3L7DLRptfIluXQ/q+hNlje3i9ccSteiVJdNsspEZ+98MbFIheWHjdddQEm8SxoD
AuXsCZnM789JRi1RUbAYsAryc//xxA4TTvLqxrA+DMP2/38XkAGSd1yr7wU7s/q2
6ZuuQ0QQahcVtG72ZFrlKmEI5twHZA==
=bVb6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
