tags 992286 patch
thanks
Hi,
I've created a PR to migrate to exfatprogs now. I would really like to get rid
of at least exfat-utils soon.
https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/libguestfs/-/merge_requests/1
Joseph, since I would like to remove exfat-fuse and exfat-utils from Debian
I see no point in making them an alternative. If someone needs it for a backport
he should add it only for the backport. But opinions might differ on that one.
Cheers,
Sven
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index ad8d629a2..571706100 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libguestfs (1:1.44.1-6) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * Migrate from exfat-utils and exfat-fuse to exfatprogs.
+ Since bullseye we have in kernel support for exFAT, no need to rely
+ on the fuse implementation anymore.
+
+ -- Sven Höxter <hoex...@debian.org> Wed, 06 Oct 2021 14:47:03 +0200
+
libguestfs (1:1.44.1-5) unstable; urgency=medium
* Attempt to fix running tests
diff --git a/debian/check-appliance-build-deps.sh b/debian/check-appliance-build-deps.sh
index ee5a9d84d..44a0f058b 100755
--- a/debian/check-appliance-build-deps.sh
+++ b/debian/check-appliance-build-deps.sh
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ m4 -DDEBIAN=1 -DEXTRA_PACKAGES= appliance/packagelist.in \
| tr ' ' '\n' \
| sed -e '/^$/d' \
-e '/^\(bash\|coreutils\|dash\|diffutils\|findutils\|grep\|gzip\|libc-bin\|sed\|tar\|util-linux\)$/d' \
- -e '/\(btrfs-tools\|fuse-exfat\|gfs2*-tools\|iproute\|module-init-tools\|procps-ng\)$/d' \
+ -e '/\(btrfs-tools\|exfat-fuse\|exfat-utils\|fuse-exfat\|gfs2*-tools\|iproute\|module-init-tools\|procps-ng\)$/d' \
| grep -v ^lib \
| grep -v ufsutils \
| sort -u \
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 9c1c827d4..2e8f9dbfc 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 12),
curl,
debootstrap,
dosfstools,
- exfat-fuse, exfat-utils,
+ exfatprogs,
extlinux [i386 amd64],
f2fs-tools,
fdisk,
