On 2021-09-23 11:44:14 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 9/23/21 11:40 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > On 2021-09-23 11:34:21, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > >> On 9/18/21 9:57 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > >>> On 2021-09-18 07:01:38 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > >>>> On 9/12/21 7:54 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Quite a few packages on mipsel may need a binNMU for the recent glibc > >>>> changes, it allowed libgdal-grass to migrate, but there a still quite a > >>>> few packages with remaining issues: > >>>> > >>>> https://linuxminded.nl/debian/gis-transitions/testing/html/gdal.html > >>> > >>> There are a over 200 packages and a bunch of binNMUs that are blocked by > >>> glibc. I'm slowly wading through that list. > >> > >> glibc migrated to testing, this allowed a few packages that are part of > >> the gdal & pdal transitions to migrate but there are still outstanding > >> issues. > >> > >> In the britney update_output.txt you see these packages as reasons why > >> the old gdal & pdal library cannot be removed, but you don't see > >> attempts to migrate those packages. > >> > >> r-cran-rgdal and r-cran-sf are blocked by r-base. > > > > They have been binNMUed in testing-proposed-updates and should migrate > > to testing in the next run. > > > >> What is preventing vtk7 and paraview from migrating? > > > >>From https://release.debian.org/britney/update_excuses.html: both the > > paraview and vtk7 binNMUs are blocked by openmpi. > > Thanks, I was looking at: > > https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=paraview > https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=vtk7 > > There is also postgis which is blocked by a piuparts regression that's > not actually caused by postgis. piuparts-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net > has been contacted about that last week, but no response so far.
Why is it failing? Have bugs been filed for this issue? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
