Hi Chris, thanks for your bugreport, but it seems to me that reprotest is not failing but rather producing failure results when rebuilding your package. Is that correct? If so, it's not a bug in reprotest... :)
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 09:33:26PM -0400, Christopher Talbot wrote: > On Mon, 2021-08-30 at 18:00 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > Maybe when the job was first run, SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH was set to a date > > later than the file unpack times (e.g. maybe due to timezone?)... and > > thus wouldn't clamp the timestamps ... that might explain re-running > > the > > job later suceeding. > > > > > > live well, > > vagrant > > Unfortunately, I do not know enough about reprotest to know what causes > it. > On a hunch, I also decided to rerun reprotest, and it worked this time: > https://salsa.debian.org/DebianOnMobile-team/vvmd/-/pipelines/283265 > > So it seems to be some sort of time/date dependent bug? Vagrant suggested a possible explaination... see above :) -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ Where will you go when you become a climate refugee?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
