Hi,
> > ladspa could do the same with
> >
> > ladspa-<pluginname>
> >
> > i.e. your initial choice sounds like the most logical solution.
>
> okay, I'll go with this.
> Maybe on the long term other ladspa packages should also switch name.
The more important part is 'Provides: ladspa-plugin', and the name is
secondary.
I'm adding a recommendation to use this naming convention if the
package name is going to be too generic otherwise.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
