Hello, On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 07:45:20PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > Could you test this patch for me? I would like to, but the patch does not apply. Investigating by hand, it seems the diff is against an even newer version than in 0.6.4-1:
if (!ok || always_print)
{
fprintf (stderr,
"\n%lld:%lld -> %s ->\n%lld:%lld "
"(diff of %lld secs %lld nsecs)\n",
(long long int) ts.tv_sec,
(long long int) ts.tv_nsec,
str,
[...]
> ? test-date.c.patch
> Index: test-date.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /var/lib/cvs/qof/qof/test/test-date.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.10
> diff -p -u -b -B -r1.10 test-date.c
> --- test-date.c 17 Apr 2006 22:09:15 -0000 1.10
> +++ test-date.c 21 Apr 2006 18:42:46 -0000
> @@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ check_time (Timespec ts, gboolean always
> if (!ok || always_print)
> {
> fprintf (stderr,
> - "\n%" G_GUINT64_FORMAT ":%" G_GUINT64_FORMAT " -> %s ->\n"
> - "%" G_GUINT64_FORMAT ":%" G_GUINT64_FORMAT " "
> - "(diff of %" G_GUINT64_FORMAT " secs %" G_GUINT64_FORMAT "
> nsecs)\n",
> + "\n%" G_GINT64_FORMAT ":%" G_GINT64_FORMAT " -> %s ->\n"
> + "%" G_GINT64_FORMAT ":%" G_GINT64_FORMAT " "
> + "(diff of %" G_GINT64_FORMAT " secs %" G_GINT64_FORMAT "
> nsecs)\n",
> (long long int) ts.tv_sec,
> (long long int) ts.tv_nsec,
> str,
> @@ -94,8 +94,8 @@ check_conversion (const char * str, Time
> if ((expected_ts.tv_sec != ts.tv_sec) || (expected_ts.tv_nsec !=
> ts.tv_nsec))
> {
> fprintf (stderr,
> - "\nmis-converted \"%s\" to %" G_GUINT64_FORMAT ".%09ld
> seconds\n"
> - "\twas expecting %" G_GUINT64_FORMAT ".%09ld seconds\n",
> + "\nmis-converted \"%s\" to %" G_GINT64_FORMAT ".%09ld seconds\n"
> + "\twas expecting %" G_GINT64_FORMAT ".%09ld seconds\n",
> str, ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec,
> expected_ts.tv_sec, expected_ts.tv_nsec);
> failure ("misconverted timespec");
it looks like a "fix for the fix".
If you need further help... :)
best regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
