Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On 31/05/2021 13.54, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2021-05-31 13:32:33, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Please unblock package insighttoolkit4
Let's add some Breaks for smoother upgrades from buster due to the hdf5
library renames.
Let's wait a bit before unblocking this one. We need to figure out how
to deal with #988722. If we end up doing a transition for that, this
Breaks is not necessary (and potentially harmful).
With hdf5 and gdal made co-installable, I still find incomplete upgrades
involving libinsighttoolkit4.12. The remaining non-coinstallable library
is libnifti2/buster from src:nifticlib (The changelog in the NMU is now
outdated (still mentioning the hdf5 renames).)
libnifti2/buster contained
/usr/lib/libnifticdf.so.2
/usr/lib/libniftiio.so.2
/usr/lib/libznz.so.2
which have been split into separate packages in bullseye:
libnifticdf2: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnifticdf.so.2
libniftiio2: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libniftiio.so.2
libznz3: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libznz.so.3 (SONAME BUMP)
Would a transitional metapackage work like for libhdf5*-103?
# apt-cache rdepends libnifti2
libnifti2
Reverse Depends:
dicomnifti
elastix
fsl-5.0-core
gifti-bin
libgiftiio0
libinsighttoolkit4.12
libmdc3
libmia-2.4-4
libnifti-dev
libsimpleitk1.0
mia-tools
minc-tools
mitools
nifti-bin
odin
python-nifti
installing all of them and thereafter checking for the users of libznz.so.2:
# dpkg -S $(grep -r libznz.so.2 /usr | awk '{print $3}') | cut -d: -f1 |
sort -u
dicomnifti
elastix
fsl-5.0-core
gifti-bin
libgiftiio0
libmdc3
libnifti2
libsimpleitk1.0
mitools
nifti-bin
odin
reintroducing libnifti2 as a transitional package depending on
libnifticdf2, libniftiio2 would have to add versioned Breaks against all
users of libznz.so.2
OK. that would work for libinsighttoolkit4.12 but if any of the other
packages is installed, co-installability is gone again.
We could also drop the Breaks: libnifti2 from libniftiio2 as there is no
direct file conflict due to multiarchification. But then we would allow
having two versions of libniftiio.so.2 installed, one linked against
libznz.so.2 the other against libznz.so.3.
So I'd favor adding the Breaks against libinsighttoolkit4.12
An example package affected by this is libotb-apps, with the Breaks
added the upgrade resolves to
- The following packages have been kept back:
- libotb-apps
+ The following packages will be REMOVED:
+ libinsighttoolkit4.12 libnifti2 libotbapplicationengine-6.6-1
+ libotbcarto-6.6-1 libotbcommandline-6.6-1 libotbcommandlineparser-6.6-1
+ libotbcommon-6.6-1 libotbcurladapters-6.6-1 libotbedge-6.6-1
+ libotbextendedfilename-6.6-1 libotbfuzzy-6.6-1 libotbgdaladapters-6.6-1
+ libotbice-6.6-1 libotbimagebase-6.6-1 libotbimageio-6.6-1
+ libotbimagemanipulation-6.6-1 libotbiobsq-6.6-1 libotbiogdal-6.6-1
+ libotbiokml-6.6-1 libotbiolum-6.6-1 libotbiomstar-6.6-1
libotbioonera-6.6-1
+ libotbiorad-6.6-1 libotbiotilemap-6.6-1 libotblearningbase-6.6-1
+ libotbmapla-6.6-1 libotbmathparser-6.6-1 libotbmetadata-6.6-1
+ libotbmonteverdi-6.6-1 libotbmonteverdicore-6.6-1
libotbmonteverdigui-6.6-1
+ libotbossimadapters-6.6-1 libotbpolarimetry-6.6-1
libotbprojection-6.6-1
+ libotbqtwidget-6.6-1 libotbrcc8-6.6-1 libotbsampling-6.6-1
+ libotbstatistics-6.6-1 libotbstreaming-6.6-1 libotbsupervised-6.6-1
+ libotbtestkernel-6.6-1 libotbvectordatabase-6.6-1
libotbvectordataio-6.6-1
+ libotbwavelet-6.6-1
Andreas
