Hi Tobi, Many thanks for your review.
>(Note: Due to the freeze, an upload to unstable is currently out of scope. You >might either want to wait for bullseye's release or target experimental for >now) I know. The new release and RFS preceded the freeze, but didn't attract a sponsor in time. I'll wait for bullseye. >Thanks for the updated package… >Some questions though: >- d/control: > - I see in the diff > - that you start Depend: on clangd and clang-format. > Is codelite _really_ depending as in Policy-Depends on it? It's long enough ago that I can't remember, but I'll check. > (there are some *arch-dependent* Build-Depends on clang stugg that seems to > be in contradiction… as the Depends are not arch-depenent this does not fit > somehow…) > - note this change is not documented in d/changelog, thats why I had to > guess: PLEASE document the _whys_ of your changes to help the sponsor out > until they improve in reading your mind… ;-) Sorry, that was an oversight. >nitpick: > - d/copyright does not need all those extra blank lines :) > >PS: You know the package is orphaned :) Could we talk you into adopting it? >(Its okay if you decline, but TIA for considering!) I know, and 40 or 50 years ago I'd have jumped at the chance. But codelite really deserves a long term maintainer, and that excludes me. >Tagging moreinfo because of the questions above (clang and freeze) >Remove the tag when you think the package is ready for a second review… Will do. Thanks again. Regards, David
