Hi,
> It's invalid C++ to declare a function re-using the same
> parameter name, although gcc accepts it. Looks like a typo
> - void line (const GS &gs, int x1, int y2, int x2, int y2);
> + void line (const GS &gs, int x1, int y1, int x2, int y2);
I guess its fine because it's only in the interface declaration; you
don't need to give any variable names there I think, the signature is
just
void line(const GS&, int, int, int, int);
But I guess upstream will happily apply your diff.
best regards,
Erich Schubert
--
erich@(vitavonni.de|debian.org) -- GPG Key ID: 4B3A135C (o_
It's not denial. I'm just selective about the reality I accept. //\
Während das Glück dir lacht, wirst Freunde du zählen in Menge; V_/_
wenn sich der Himmel bewölkt, findest du dich bald allein.
