Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, it falls just on the wrong side; licenses can restrict the name of > the *work*, as in the human-parsable name, but filenames serve as a > functional component of a work. This issue came up with the previous > version of the LPPL.
You are right. Let's just remove it, it's obsolete cruft anyway, useful only for some hypothetical centuries-old documents. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
