On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 at 00:13:16 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-03-28 13:47:46 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > How would the release team prefer to handle [glib_check_version()]
> > in future? I think the options go like this:
> >
> > 1. Don't treat glib_check_version() specially in the .symbols file: it's
> > just another symbol, marked as having been introduced in GLib 2.6.
>
> I prefer this option. If reverse dependencies misuse glib_check_version
> without defining the proper dependencies, then they need to be fixed.
Thanks, if nobody disagrees with this then I'll close #985890 as "not
a bug". For now I've downgraded it to non-RC.
smcv
