On Mon, 2021-03-22 at 05:41 +0000, Surla, Sai Kalyan wrote:

> In this case can we still go with the temporary change that you
> suggested as the issue is little different with this PST?

The temporary change will not work for the second PST, since it only
works around the header detection issue, but the second PST doesn't
have the full MIME headers, only the predefined PST To/CC/BCC fields.

There isn't any easy workaround for the issue with the second PST.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to