severity 297789 important thanks On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:25:53AM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:15:29AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: > > How much longer should I wait for the latest and and most updated patch? > I was not aware you where waiting for an updated patch since one year > (or two, counting the other bug which contained code to activate rdev, > too). > > and what specifically makes this a policy violation and/or release > > critical bug (thereby justifying serious, and threatening NMU?) > rdev missing on amd64 since 1 year. > Maybe serious is a too hgh priority, but it is at least important, and > the NMU would have been a porter NMU. If you can't point to a specific reason this should be serious, then yes, it's too high. I think it's been the better part of a decade since the last time I needed to use rdev; hardly seems worth a porter NMU IMHO. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
