Le jeudi 28 janvier 2021, 08:38:33 UTC Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) a écrit : > Hello Bastien, > > On 1/27/21 4:48 PM, roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Bastien Roucariès <ro...@debian.org> > > > > Some variables are portable at least under UNIX > > > > Signed-off-by: Bastien Roucariès <ro...@debian.org> > > --- > > > > man7/environ.7 | 11 +++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/man7/environ.7 b/man7/environ.7 > > index d889310d6..ec886d83d 100644 > > --- a/man7/environ.7 > > +++ b/man7/environ.7 > > @@ -242,6 +242,17 @@ tell applications about the window size, possibly > > overriding the actual size.> > > may specify the desired printer to use. > > See > > .BR lpr (1). > > > > +.SH CONFORMING TO > > +The variables > > +.B HOME > > +.B LOGNAME, > > +.B PATH, > > +.B PWD, > > +and > > +.B SHELL > > +are specified by > > +POSIX.1-1996 > > +and should be reasonably portable. > > Why this particular version of the standard? You don't explain. > > I don't have a copy of POSIX.1-1996; where did you find it? > > I do have a copy of SUSv3, where I expect that much of the detail > is the same as 1996, and there are many other environment variables > specified in that standard, including TZ, LC_*, LINES, COLUMNS, and > TMPDIR. If you start mentioning standards, but you list only > HOME, LOGNAME, PATH, and PWD, I think it implies to the reader > that those other variables are *not* specified in the standard. Ok will try to reword this part. > > If we're going to document which EVs are in the standards, > (and I'm not sure it is something we want to do), then I think > the information needs to be more consistently done, and also > in the commit message I would want much more precise details > about where the info about each variable was foind. > > Thanks, > > Michael > > > .SH NOTES > > The > > .BR prctl (2)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
