On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 11:26 PM Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 17 Jan 2021, 23:04 Mattia Rizzolo, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 11:01:12PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >> > > Or is there any reason offlineimap3 should not be in bullseye? >> > >> > But offlineimap3 can only migrate after offlineimap is removed and >> > src:python-imaplib2 drops its python2 package, so I guess its better >> > to go ahead with the RM while I wait for upstream's reply. If it is >> > not removed by then, then I will upload the transitional package like >> > Mattia suggested. >> >> Then, what about this other way: >> * src:python-imaplib2 drops its python2 lib >> * ftp-master forces its removal, while keeping src:offlineimap >> ? > > > I have requested the maintainer to drop the python2 lib at > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937831#27 but why do you > want to keep src:offlineimap?
I am going to do a NMU to DELAYED-2 for #937831 to drop the python2 lib. -- Regards Sudip
