On Wed, 09 Dec 2020 11:13:23 +0100 =?utf-8?q?J=C3=B6rg_Behrmann?= <behrm...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Package: systemd > Version: 246.6-2~bpo10+1 > Severity: wishlist > > Dear systemd maintainers, > > judging from salsa [1] and the file lists of the systemd package on > buster-backports and sid, systemd is currently built without the the > systemd-repart binary. > > It would be great if this tool could be distributed either in the systemd > package or, if deemed necessary, as a new package systemd-repart, like > systemd-container. > > I think this tool is pretty standalone and its inclusion shouldn't hurt people > not using it, but it would remove the burden of having to rebuild the systemd > package from people wanting to use it.
repart requires openssl and so far I tried to avoid linking against both gnutls and openssl. There are attempts upstream to consolidate around openssl. Once that happens, I feel more comfortable enabling repart. This is most likely/certainly bookworm material, i.e. I don't plan to change that for bullseye. Regards, Michael
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
