On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:32:25AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I agree with salvatore, that in general disabling pdf is the safer solution.
Yeah, this was intentionally, but I missed an entry for this in
debian/changelog.
> I am slowly recovering from work debt due to covid 19 lockdown in
> France (i was locked down three month, and I could only work by night
> for payjob so debian work was not done), but I will accept patch.
>
> The solution of this tradeoff problem is a debconf question. I will accept
> patch
I don't think we need debconf here, policy.xml is a conffile, which can be
edited locally
if one accepts the risk or uses Ghostscript with trusted input only.
Cheers,
Moritz
