Hi, [trimming the recipients, dropping the ftp.d.o bug and ftp-masters]
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 08:43:06PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > Le 05/12/2020 à 18:58, Mark Hymers a écrit : > > On Sat, 05, Dec, 2020 at 12:26:27PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru spoke thus.. > > > > So you are right, thanks for spotting my mistake, which is because I > > > > indeed only check if dak rm would cause any issues. I agree that we > > > > thus likely cannot remove it for now from unstable. > > > It has been removed despite this comment. This causes a bunch of breakage. > > > Could you please bring it back? > > At the request of the release-team, we re-injected the packages which > > were still in testing back into unstable. Should be back at the next > > dinstall. > Excellent, many thanks! Thanks for bringing it back! I have lowered the severity for #969839 accordingly to move it away from RC severity and avoiding it going to removed from testing but still tracking so RUSTSEC-2020-0036 issue. For me the question which remains: Given rust-failure has many "reverse dependencies", but it is officially EOLed/deprecated upstream, do we have away to fade out it's usage in the (middle/long?) term within Debian? It won't be possible so it looks for bullseye, but should we aim for later? Regards, Salvatore
