Hi Vagrant,
thanks for the prompt fix! I consider to be sufficiently fixed given
that this line wasn't needed before and hence seems to be optional
anyways.
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> There are a few other issues related to the lack of proper support for
> init.d scripts as well, and it would be nice to fix issues to support
> other init systems... any help would be appreciated!
Sorry, since I have no idea for what a package manager needs an init
script (or its own user, except maybe for privilege separation during
downloads), I have no idea what actually an init script should do
here.
Looking at /usr/lib/sysusers.d/guix-daemon.conf it seems as if guix
needs some kind of daemon?!? That's unexpected.
I'm also not convinced by guix' concepts (and containing a daemon just
added one more argument against guix) and just installed it to maybe
occasionally understand more if its something useful for me or not.
So I currently neither consider myself a regular user nor a potential
future contributor besides reporting obvious packaging-related bugs
like this one.
[opensysusers]
> I did ask zigo about the status of opensysusers on IRC, and got the
> impression that it might be orphaned or removed from the archive,
I see.
> so did not pursue further, though does not sound like it would be
> difficult to add support.
Ok for me.
> Alternate to having a working sysusers.d implementation, it could be
> documented in README.Debian to create the users and groups manually.
Would be fine for me.
I though wonder if a "Recommends: systemd" or "Suggests: systemd"
would make sense here.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <[email protected]>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
