Hi Dmitry, On 2020-11-07 1:20 p.m., Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > I think the problem is not that hppa is not detected, but rather that the code > has some assumptions about the stack growing down. The QML engine has a lot of > low-level code... That's what I was afraid of. If these assumptions are localized, it would help if you could point them out. The code seems to have its own stack implementation. > > Can you check if your patch actually makes some tests pass that failed without > it? I revised the patch somewhat but it doesn't help much. > >> The PA-RISC architecture is big endian. Perhaps this needs to be defined >> somewhere else as well? > Qt uses this file from qtbase: > > https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/src/corelib/global/qprocessordetection.h > > which falls back to gcc's __BYTE_ORDER__ macro for unknown architectures. > So it should work fine if that macro is defined correctly on hppa. As far as I know, the __BYTE_ORDER__ macro is defined correctly for hppa.
Regards, Dave -- John David Anglin [email protected]
