X-Debbugs-CC: jo...@debian.org Hi,
On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 22:20:16 +0200 Joerg Jaspert <jo...@debian.org> wrote: > Package: easyssh > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > your package, just accepted from NEW, contains > > /usr/bin/com.github.muriloventuroso.easyssh > > as its binary. > For a package named easyssh, thats not what users will expect. Please > fix and give it the correct name, easyssh. Thanks for the suggestion. However as a packager, I found myself not in the position of renaming the binary file at all. It's upstream's decision to decide which binary name to use. Besides, it is obvious that upstream does not want the user to call the binary file from terminal (using .desktop entry instead is easier). I plan to provide /usr/bin/easyssh via update-alternatives tool. This is better than making a plain symlink. It is almost sure that someone will try to provide /usr/bin/easyssh in another project sooner or later since this is a good name. Thanks, Boyuan Yang
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
