On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 08:12:56PM +0100, Johan Svedberg wrote: > * Feb 13 00:52 Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Howdy, > > > > I ran mono under gdb, and here is the result: > > > > Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. > > [Switching to Thread 65541 (LWP 2656)] > > ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit--- > > 0x0ffe6560 in mono_jit_stats () from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0 > > (gdb) bt > > #0 0x0ffe6560 in mono_jit_stats () from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0 > > #1 0x0feca9d8 in mono_arch_print_tree () from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0 > > #2 0x0feca9d8 in mono_arch_print_tree () from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0 > > #3 0x0feca9d8 in mono_arch_print_tree () from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0 > > #4 0x0feca9d8 in mono_arch_print_tree () from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0 > > #5 0x0feca9d8 in mono_arch_print_tree () from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0 > > #6 0x0feca9d8 in mono_arch_print_tree () from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0 > > #7 0x0feca9d8 in mono_arch_print_tree () from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0 > > #8 0x0feca9d8 in mono_arch_print_tree () from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0 > > #9 0x0feca9d8 in mono_arch_print_tree () from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0 > > #10 0x0feca9d8 in mono_arch_print_tree () from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0 > > #11 0x0feca9d8 in mono_arch_print_tree () from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0 > > #12 0x0feca9d8 in mono_arch_print_tree () from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0 > > #13 0x0feca9d8 in mono_arch_print_tree () from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0 > > #14 0x0feca9d8 in mono_arch_print_tree () from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0 > > #15 0x0feca9d8 in mono_arch_print_tree () from /usr/lib/libmono.so.0 > > Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) > > (gdb) > > Upstream says: > > "No idea what this might be, the trace doesn't give any hints either and > I've never seen this or heard it from anyone else during the last 6 > months so it might be some flaky Mono/Gtk#/Gecko# installation? > > I'm closing this one but if you can provide more information on whether > it's reproducable by doing something special, or a better stack trace or > something please reopen." > > I'm tagging accordingly.
It's painfully reproducible here. Please let me know what other information I can provide to help. -- Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
