On 12/04/2006 David Härdeman wrote: > I've taken a closer look at the current situation, and it seems likely that > the list can be shortened... > > Running "ldd /sbin/cryptsetup" yields: > linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000) > libpopt.so.0 => /lib/libpopt.so.0 (0xb7ef5000) > libdevmapper.so.1.02 => /lib/libdevmapper.so.1.02 (0xb7ee4000) > libuuid.so.1 => /lib/libuuid.so.1 (0xb7ee0000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7da8000) > libselinux.so.1 => /lib/libselinux.so.1 (0xb7d94000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f0b000) > libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0xb7d90000) > libsepol.so.1 => /lib/libsepol.so.1 (0xb7d51000) > > no trace of libgpg-error0 and libgcrypt11 there...looking at the debian/rules > file we see: > > ... > # cannot depend on libraries in /usr ! > gcc lib/.libs/*.o src/*.o luks/.libs/*.o -o src/cryptsetup.static \ > -lpopt -ldevmapper -luuid /usr/lib/libgcrypt.a \ > /usr/lib/libgpg-error.a > ... > > > So if libgpg-error0 and libgcrypt11 are statically linked into cryptsetup, and > libdevmapper and libuuid already have udebs, only a libpopt udeb (bug #358671) > should be needed and the wishlist bugs against libgpg-error0 and libgcrypt11 > can be dropped. > > Jonas, is this analysis correct?
you're absolutely correct. i already got this weeks ago, sorry for being too stupid to send one single email. i just didn't have time to take a closer look. ... jonas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
