Hi Thorsten! On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 02:34:01PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Hi Nicholas, > > >Re-sending this bug update to your debian.org address, because > >t...@mirbsd.de emitted the following during the last attempt > > yes, this is an issue with Googlemail not honouring internet > standards; nnnnnn-submitter@b.d.o is a generic fallback in case > you can’t figure out a different eMail address. >
Agreed, googlemail has plenty of issues, but the submitter for this bug is t...@mirbsd.de (unreachable), while t...@debian.org (reachable). So it looks to me like this bug fell through the cracks during the process of changing submitter of your bugs from the former to the latter. I could be wrong of course; that's just what it looks like to me :-) P.S. This situation is also a good motivation for maintainers who use self-hosted email to work towards DD: eg, then users who aren't familiar with advanced BTS use can follow-up on bugs, and reach the pkg's maintainer, because the debian.org address forwards it. BTW, why did you use -quiet? Was that an ideological decision? > >Would you please test 1.4.2+dfsg-1 currently available in testing and > >unstable? I can provide a buster-backport for testing purposes if > > I can do that, but it’ll probably take me some days, first I > need to find that device… (and something to flash). > Thanks, much appreciated! I'm guessing that by now your device could use a TWRP upgrade, so maybe that? > I use sid, so no backporting needed. > Wonderful :-) > Thanks! > You're welcome! > Stéphane, I actually don’t block Googlemail, they’re just too utterly > stupid to successfully deliver to me (or anyone else using Greylisting > and not whitelisting their ranges). Same for a few other providers such > as Hotmail. Some spammers (Yahoo) I do block. It sounds like your greylist could benefit from SPF Record updates--either supervised, or automatic, as you prefer. Sincerely, Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
