On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 11:18 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:

> While I agree that this is unfortunate, I have no idea how to avoid it
> without teaching isenkram about all packages and their relationship in
> Debian, a feature I believe isenkram should not have.

That seems reasonable.

> Anyone got any ideas how to use the existing metadata in the package
> archive to do better choices?

For gkrellm-thinkbat the fact that it is a plugin combined with the
fact that I don't have the dependencies installed should be enough to
rule it out. Some plugins might use Enhances instead of Depends.

$ apt-cache show gkrellm-thinkbat | grep -o 'role::[^ ,]*'
role::plugin
role::program
$ apt-cache show gkrellm-thinkbat | grep Depends
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.7), gkrellm (>= 2.0.0)

I cannot think of any straight-forward way to avoid the tpb suggestion,
a more complicated way might be to demote things not using the same
uitoolkit:: tag as my current desktop, but there would still not be any
way to know that tpb provides the same functionality as my desktop.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to