On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 08:16:46PM +0200, Noèl Köthe wrote: > > The ftpmasters have recently rejected a package that contains another > > schema file with identical license text, and there was no obvious > > opposition to that decision on Debian legal [0], so the current > > understanding seems to be that this license is not free. > > > [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/04/threads.html > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/04/msg00051.html ff.
That whole discussion is silly. I am not a lawyer but I for me it looks
like you are not allowed to modify the RFC document which is fine in
this context. It's just that we use the schema documented in the RFC.
Greetings
Torsten
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
