Hello Sebastiaan, On Sat 11 Jul 2020 at 08:37PM +02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> The FTBFS on mips64el is persistent, and qgis is already removed on that > architecture via #953671. Ah right. >> Could you confirm this issue is not likely to get fixed anytime soon? > > 3.10.7+dfsg-1~exp1 FTBFS on eberlin, and 3.10.7+dfsg-1 FTBFS on > mipsel-manda-02, both had the same issue: "Error: branch out of range". > > 3.10.7+dfsg-1 was given back because it was part of the qt transition > and succeeded on mipsel-aql-01. > > I expect a subsequent binNMU or new upload to FTBFS again, so removing > qgis from mipsel is still a good idea in my opinion. > > If we're lucky mips* may not meet the architecture qualifications and be > removed for bullseye and this qgis not alway building successfully there > will become moot. So, you'd say that the successful build was a random success, and it *usually* fails? To be honest it seems odd to me remove something based on a random failure, but if it is much more often than not and you think the upstream issue is unlikely to get fixed soon, I will trust your judgement. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
