Dear colleagues, I am importing dav1d 0.7.1 in an hour. Please consider this FYI to avoid double work. -- Vasyl Gello ================================================== Certified SolidWorks Expert
Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77 E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmail.com Skype: vasek.gello ================================================== 호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다 July 2, 2020 8:20:11 AM UTC, Vasyl Gello <vasek.ge...@gmail.com> написав(-ла): >Hi Jonas! > >I also can volunteer uploading 0.7.1 as part of my kodi work. >Also, is it a good idea to reach Joerg Jaspert directly and kindly ask for >review? > >Why am I asking this: I have two pending packages (libudfread & shairplay). >At the same time, I am preparing full Kodi binary addon archive (84 source >packages). > >I am carefully investigating copyrights and perform builds and tests in the >publuc unofficial repo >(see relevant d-multimedia discussiob). However, I don't want to wait YEARS >after Kodi reaches >release. Instead, I am using my sparevtime to keep packaging ready as >development of Kodi upstream >progresses. > >With such enormous waiting times and no understandingbof how to solve it >gracefully, the whole project >might become a waste of time and I obviously try avoiding it. >-- >Vasyl Gello >================================================== >Certified SolidWorks Expert > >Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77 > >E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmail.com > >Skype: vasek.gello >================================================== >호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다 > >July 2, 2020 8:11:03 AM UTC, Jonas Smedegaard <jo...@jones.dk> написав(-ла): >>Quoting Dylan Aïssi (2020-07-02 09:29:51) >>> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 +0000 Vasyl Gello <vasek.ge...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. >>> > Can you please package it? >>> >>> dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1 >>> year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last >>> attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably >>> convert this ITP to RFP... >> >>I guess the rejection is what you quoted in >>https://bugs.debian.org/916333#25 >> >>Thanks, btw, for quoting like that to make conversations with ftpmasters >>more transparent. Much appreciated! >> >>Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not? >> >>If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I >>would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting >>situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in >>debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package. >> >>When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into >>irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package. >> >>If you haven't given up yet, then would you be interesting in >>maintaining the package collaboratively? I can offer to help if you >>would be interested in doing so e.g. in the Multimedia team. >> >>If you have given up already, then I can offer to take over. >> >>Kind regards, >> >> - Jonas >> >>-- >> * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt >> * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ >> >> [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
