Andreas Tille <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 02:25:58PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote: >> My current impression is that makeblastdb is unable to work >> properly on most 32 bits machines, because the amount of memory >> needing to be addressed by the process looks like it might >> exceed too easily 32 bits architectural limits.
That's entirely plausible; upstream tends to assume 64-bit systems nowadays. Explicitly supplying -blastdb_version 4 (the default prior to BLAST+ 2.10.x) may help. Thanks for calling this report to my attention! -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/[email protected]
