On 24 May 2020 at 07:57, Paul Gevers wrote: | Source: quantlib-swig | Version: 1.17-1 | Severity: serious | Control: close -1 1.18-1 | Tags: sid bullseye | User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org | Usertags: out-of-sync | | Dear maintainer(s), | | As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that | are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as | having a Release Critical bug in testing. Your package src:quantlib-swig | in its current version in unstable has been trying to migrate for 60 | days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug. | | If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer | period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be | fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on | other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult. | Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or | its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that | hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner. | | This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new | bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed. | | I have immediately closed this bug with the version in unstable, so if | that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect | testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bullseye, so | it doesn't affect (old-)stable. | | If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to | issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
It is. See the build logs: virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory error: command 'g++' failed with exit status 1 make: *** [debian/rules:101: build-stamp] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-arch subprocess returned exit status 2 This used to build. It just takes a long as it is a library with old-school many templates "big C++". There is nothing I can do here. If it ends being removed because nobody can change the build toggle on that platform so be it. I understand the concern and agree with it. But there is nothing I think I can do. Dirk | Paul | | [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg00005.html | [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=quantlib-swig | | | [DELETED ATTACHMENT signature.asc, application/pgp-signature] -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
