-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 15:05 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 21:56 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > Yves-Alexis Perez <[email protected]> writes:
> > > kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone is already set to 0 by default so it's
> > > not
> > > really needed here.
> > 
> > Hence "explicitly", for the sake of anyone running a custom kernel that
> > accidentally wound up with a lax default.
> 
> Yes indeed, that's a good point.

Actually no, it's not. kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone comes from a Debian
specific patch which is not mainline:

- - a non-Debian kernel won't have it (and the sysctl will result in an error)
- - a rebuilt Debian kernel will have it and set to 0 by default
- - a rebuild Debian kernel with the patch removed or set to 1 by default would
have been done explicitely, so I don't see the use of the sysctl either.

All in all I don't think it's worth changing the file (there's already a
comment in there).

Regards,
- -- 
Yves-Alexis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAl60CK0ACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFs2WAf/Ua5JUgUHyggwMTFiZ7DDgY8CHAFV8H+QnhmQIY9gEE6ILXEqzHt8SWfo
62zwfjUZ3MGhnPuJG9c7Mvy4Sl+I7TUwT9PMubKkRK1jqckTVFJVA3J2VSI9CrB0
Ph9pfwMbvlXE6UJNuH+nPYqhA3k0w6n1kXr9S6lxVbUdHKzK74W7Bg3l7dOUhzkT
ZD1dBm6PT4x1drpkfs6fm2qP4CPAK0yoBu4ePnCo+lyq66FgPU4BLjQk1swqN4/9
3g5TtVGVyLdakZa6yCUJ0n17pvjxHsSbU8HuDhz8rR7a6r4/yfYDkuqigZcEoITF
ir3d6DWTzustbNztXbELgubTizGPUg==
=JfRx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to