Hi Chris, 在 2020/5/4 上午6:09, Chris Hofstaedtler 写道: > Hi xiao sheng wen, > > I've noticed you've recently taken over maintenance of the eject > package, after it was unmaintained for years. > > Probably unbeknownst to you, plans were made to replace the eject > (and eject-udeb) packages with code from util-linux.
I didn't know this plan before,I can't get this info from the RFA bugreport of eject(#924444). > > I understand that it must be somewhat soul-crushing when this > happens, so I wanted to loop you in. Never mind! Thanks for loop me in. I'm just learning packaging .I hope contribute to Debian,let Debian become more better. > Do you think it's alright if we move forward with replacing the old, > dead-upstream eject with the code from util-linux? The eject upstream git repo is [1],from the log ,I know the lasted commit[2] is on Aug 21 21:42:30 2019. Is this a dead-upstream? > > My plan would be to take over the eject, eject-udeb packages sometime > next week (obviously going through NEW, so maybe a bit later). I'd read the bug #737658,from this bugreport,I learned more info about udeb,d-i,etc. :-) IMHO,I had a little worry about commands: volname and dmcrypt-get-device(suid). volname is still used by dkopp[3]. After the replace plan finished,Are these two commands will disappear in Debian 11 ? If has one shell scripts used these two commands in Debian 10,when the OS update to Debian 11, Do the shell scripts need to modify?How to modify? > > Best regards, > Chris [1] git clone https://git.code.sf.net/p/eject/git eject-git [2] https://sourceforge.net/p/eject/git/ci/12a22efd2b678479ceca63731491a6843c5a7a68/ [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787425 > -- 肖盛文 Faris Xiao 微信：atzlinux ＱＱ：909868357 铜豌豆 Linux 基于 Debian 的 Linux 中文桌面操作系统：https://www.atzlinux.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
