Package: alpine
Version: 2.22+dfsg1-1~bpo10+1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
* What outcome did you expect instead?
I expected to work properly as version 2.20 does
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.1
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-9-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=el_GR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=el_GR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=el_GR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages alpine depends on:
ii libc6 2.28-10
ii libgssapi-krb5-2 1.17-3
ii libkrb5-3 1.17-3
ii libldap-2.4-2 2.4.47+dfsg-3+deb10u1
ii libssl1.1 1.1.1c-1
ii libtinfo6 6.1+20181013-2+deb10u1
ii mlock 8:2007f~dfsg-6
Versions of packages alpine recommends:
ii alpine-doc 2.21+dfsg1-1.1
ii sensible-utils 0.0.12
Versions of packages alpine suggests:
ii aspell 0.60.7~20110707-6
ii exim4-daemon-light [mail-transport-agent] 4.92-8+deb10u3
-- no debconf information
