The PasDoc manpage in Debian is done using
help2man --output=pasdoc.1 --name="documentation tool for Pascal source code" \
--no-info bin/pasdoc
Do we know what the message "Could not determine section for" means,
or how to investigate it? I mean, this manpage should go to section 1
("User Commands"), which is indicated both by the filename "pasdoc.1"
and by text inside "pasdoc(1)". Why does the dh_installman not catch
it?
If necessary, I can easily create a proper manpage upstream (that
would be available in our repository, without the need for help2man),
I just need to know what is exactly required / necessary to avoid :)
Regards,
Michalis
niedz., 22 mar 2020 o 15:03 Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@debian.org> napisał(a):
>
> Source: pasdoc
> Version: 0.15.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200322 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > fakeroot debian/rules binary
> > dh binary
> > dh_testroot
> > dh_prep
> > dh_auto_install
> > dh_install
> > dh_installdocs
> > dh_installchangelogs
> > dh_installman
> > dh_installman: error: Could not determine section for ./pasdoc.1
> > dh_installman: error: Aborting due to earlier error
> > make: *** [debian/rules:13: binary] Error 25
>
> The full build log is available from:
> http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/03/22/pasdoc_0.15.0-1_unstable.log
>
> A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
> http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
>
> About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
> Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
> failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-pascal-devel mailing list
> pkg-pascal-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-pascal-devel
