On 3/26/20 8:51 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry if I'm too far off the tree, but isn't this just an overlook of > the dependency switch from libgcc1 (which has an "1" epoch) to the > libgcc-s1 (which doesn't have an epoch)? > > ATM at least clang-9 (which is still the default in unstable) depends on > libgcc-8-dev, and while I probably miss some important details, I fail > to see why we have to drop gcc-8 because of this?
yes, but we cannot rebuild the package, because it build-depends on gnat-8. Filed a removal bug for gcc-8 instead.
