On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:05:59PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Here's a thought:
>
> Given the concern Adrian has expressed relative to tahoe-lafs, how about if
> someone uploads the relevant packages to experimental:
>
> python-txsocksx -> foolscap -> tahoe-lafs
>
> Then the Unstable rm can go forward, but in the event python2 stays in the
> bullseye release, it's easy to re-introduce. It wouldn't even need to go
> through New. You'd probably want to upload any other depends that might drop
> python2 support as well with a sufficiently high version that they won't get
> removed due to NVIU.
How would this bring any advantage?
Sandro seems to be working mainly on testing, and RC bugs already exist
that prevent re-migration to testing.
> Scott K
cu
Adrian
BTW: The Christmas Eve removal in #937449 a few days after removal
from testing and despite maintainer objection might be a good
example how early removal from unstable makes people not happy.
