Source: goffice Version: 0.10.46-1 Hi,
I need to ask, since this is so weird:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 12~) ,dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1.1)
,gobject-introspection (>= 1.41.4)
,gtk-doc-tools
,intltool (>= 0.35.0)
,libcairo2-dev (>= 1.10.0)
,libcairo2-doc
,libgirepository1.0-dev
,libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.28.0)
,libglib2.0-doc
,libgsf-1-dev (>= 1.14.25-2)
,libgtk-3-dev
,libgtk-3-doc
,libpango1.0-dev
,libpango1.0-doc
,librsvg2-dev
,libxext-dev
,libxml-parser-perl
,libxml2-dev
,libxml2-doc
,libxrender-dev
,libxslt1-dev | libxslt-dev
you build-depend on libcairo2-doc, libglib2.0-doc, libgtk-3-doc,
libpango1.0-doc and libxml2-doc. Is that really necessary?
It just came to bite me while doing rebuilds for libxml2, since I didn't
place the -doc package in the testing repository, figuring nothing would
care about it. What a surprise!
I can't really imagine anything that would care about documentations
during a build, but please prove me wrong. :)
However, I must remind you that according to the Debian Policy nothing
can depend nor assume the content of /usr/share/doc/ for proper
functioning, as that directory could be excluded in the dpkg
configuration, and that's considered valid according to the Policy.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
