Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> writes: > On 21-11-2019 13:59, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> [Disclaimer: the words below are as a member of the release team, but >> not necessarily those of the team. We haven't discussed this yet.] > We have had a discussion, and there were no objections against my vision > below. >> I can envision that if Policy carries such a summary list, our policy >> would mention the version of Policy it was based on, to make sure that >> Policy doesn't suddenly change what we as the RT agreed on. > So, yes, we would welcome the Policy to maintain a summary list that we > could reference. We already acknowledge that there will be items in the > Policy text that we balance differently for RC-ness, so there will be > exceptions maintained by us. Thanks, Paul! This is now on me to compose this list, and I'll let you know when that's done. Once that's complete, we can do a reconciliation. I'm inclined to downgrade Policy musts that the release team does not consider likely to be release-critical in the future, for instance. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>