also sprach David W. Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.03.0050 +0100]: > I consider this an architectural problem. It's not proper for a daemon > that might listen to multiple interfaces to exit prematurely.
True, but this is not how it's used in Debian. > As I said on the dhcp-client mailing list recently, > architecturally we want to move to a single-daemon-per-interface > model, and from there it makes a whole lot more sense to exit jsut > as a sanity check if the interface the daemon was targetted to > goes away. As said, for Debian, it would make sense to treat it single-daemon-per-interface already, IMHO. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
