Package: rustc Version: 1.37.0+dfsg1-1 Severity: normal adequate reports:
rustc: broken-symlink /usr/bin/rust-lld -> lld-8 Is this symlink really needed? Or should lld-8 be harder dependency? -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/32 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages rustc depends on: ii binutils 2.33.1-2 ii gcc 4:9.2.1-3.1 ii libc6 2.29-2 ii libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.29-2 ii libgcc1 1:9.2.1-15 ii libllvm8 1:8.0.1-3+b1 ii libstd-rust-dev 1.37.0+dfsg1-1 ii libstdc++6 9.2.1-15 Versions of packages rustc recommends: ii cargo 0.37.0-3 ii rust-gdb 1.37.0+dfsg1-1 Versions of packages rustc suggests: pn lld-8 <none> pn rust-doc <none> pn rust-src <none> -- no debconf information
