On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:16:04 +0200 Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since the libgdchart-gd2 maintainer hasn't responded to your request > for more information, let me fill in my best guesses. I think there > used to be a package literally called "libgd2-dev", which has since > been dropped from the archive; if true, this could explain how the > package was able to build before. It appears libgdchart-gd2 replaced > the libgd2-dev output, whatever it was, with "libgd2-noxpm-dev | > libgd2-xpm-dev" in both -dev packages, so that's probably a > reasonable dependency string to use. Thanks, Daniel, for clarifying this. And sorry for being so unresponsive. I have been busy with real life, and with other issues regarding yaird and linux-26. I agree with Daniel that binary dependency resolving to "libgd2-dev" should be adjusted to use "libgd2-noxpm-dev | libgd2-xpm-dev" instead. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
pgpKuc7A6bxAN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
