Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, R.Ramkumar wrote: >> I guess I am mistaken. The feature request was to augment domount so >> that it could allow calls for bind mounts from init functions such >> as mountvirtfs. Correct me if I am wrong, but afaik these don't even >> need an entry in /etc/fstab (domount at best takes options from >> there if an entry exists). > > You're correct, I did not understand the report fully.
As for me... I was very confused. Sorry! > Thomas, what do you think? mount will tell us if -t none is not what it > wants, and it is exactly what it wants for --bind, --move, --make-shared (or > their alternative fstab-friendly hacks of -obind, -omove...). Now that I understand it, the patch as provided by R. Ramkumar looks OK to me. (When domount's first argument is "bind", the function does a bind mount.) HMH: Can you explain your idea further? What do you envision domount() doing when its first argument is "none"? -- Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
