On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 07:49:27PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > > Hi Domenico,
Hi Paul, hmm.. I'm not receiving messages from the bts in my mailbox, hence the late reply. > On 30-07-2019 19:09, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > * Autopkgtest on libc-bin-dbgsym instead of dwarves-dbgsym. Closes: > > #923717. > > Unless I am very much mistaken, this is not really fixing the issue. The > problem is that the unstable debug archive isn't available during > migration testing (that's bug #917528, to be fixed in debci). Hence, the > test will still fail if it needs the libc-bin-dbgsym package from > unstable. Please add the skip-not-installable restriction as I > recommended in my initial bug report. The "test" (much to be improved) just needs debug symbols for trying to analyze some binary. It's very simple test to prove that pahole does not die badly like when DWARF-4 has been introduced. At the moment does not really matter if such symbols are coming from testing or unstable as long as they match the version of the binary being analyzed. I thought to untangle a little bit the situation in using some binary different from dwarves itself, in that: dwarves/unstable + dwarves-dbgsym/testing => unsatisfiable Do you still think that skip-not-installable is better? Why? thanks, Domenico -- 3B10 0CA1 8674 ACBA B4FE FCD2 CE5B CF17 9960 DE13
